• NEWS

  • ABOUT US

  • OUR WORK

  • COMMUNITY

  • ARCHIVES

  • Blog

  • More

    Contact Us

    FAQs

    Become a Member

    TribUnion

    SU Elections

    SU Financial Rules

    Mission Reports

    SU meetings

    Events

    Joint Negotiating Committee

    Completion Strategy

    Permanent Contracts

    Staff Management Committee

    CCISUA

    UN ICTY Gift Shop

    Staff Interviews

    NEWS

    ABOUT US

    OUR WORK

    COMMUNITY

    ARCHIVES

    Who's Who

    Discounts

    SU Constitution

    What We Do

    Staff Union

    ICSC Summer Session: Update on the 7,7 percent pay cut

    September 5, 2017

     

     

     

     

    UN-Criminal Tribunals Staff Union President and Vice President of CCISUA, Fraser McIlwraith, attended the ICSC summer session in Vienna, where UN Staff Unions, senior management and expert statisticians participated to ask that the ICSC reconsider the 7,7 percent pay cut.

     

    A series of staff meetings and campaigns preceded the session, at which inconsistencies were pointed out in the ICSC’s data and led many Geneva-based organizations to refuse to implement the pay cut as well as express strong support for staff.

     

    The ICSC’s decision, made in late March in New York, would require the pay cut of a month a year salary to be implemented in May for newly arriving staff in Geneva, and from August for existing staff.

     

    The Human Resources Network (HRN) expert statisticians raised questions, as in this paper, with regards to the ICSC’s calculations and application of the methodology. CCISUA, together with Geneva-based staff unions and management, asked that the ICSC:

     

     

    • Reintroduce the gap closure method;

    • Freeze implementation for all duty stations including Geneva, Rome and Madrid;

    • Review the calculations and methodology.

     

    Consideration of the issue took place over four days. The ICSC’s final decision was to:

     

     

    • Reaffirm its calculations (despite the concerns raised by the expert statisticians) for all of the HQ duty stations surveyed in October 2016;

    • Reintroduce a gap closure measure (mitigation buffer) of 3 percent on top of the new pay index, thus reducing the original net 7.7 percent cut by 2.7 percent;

    • Implement the change from August 2017 instead of May 2017 for new staff;

    • Introduce a further delay in implementation for existing staff, making the new effective implementation date February 2018;

    • Conduct a review of post adjustment methodology for the future.

     

    CCISUA raised as a serious concern the situation of staff who had arrived in May 2017 and have already had their pay cut. We are asking management to clarify whether the staff can be refunded retroactively, as well as, whether they would be reclassified as existing staff, having arrived before the revised implementation date of August.

     

     

    For staff arriving as of August, we remain concerned that an administratively cumbersome and socially unfair two-track system will be introduced.
    As to the delay until February 2018 for existing staff, this was designed to allow possible increases in the pay index between now and then, thus further reducing the cut by adjusting for:

     

     

    • A likely pay increase for US federal civil servants, against whom the pay in Geneva is benchmarked, of 1.9 percent, as announced by the US government, as well as additional locality pay;

    • Inflation in New York that would reduce the supposed gap between purchasing power of Geneva and New York.

     

    Based on this, it is estimated that the cut could be in the range of 1 to 2 percent. However, the nature of the ICSC’s decision, which is subject to the variables mentioned above, means this is only an estimate and should not constitute the basis for staff’s budget planning.

     

     
    In sum:

     

    • The precise size of the cut is not known and, as it stands, the organizations subscribe to a system that allows the pay of staff worldwide to be cut on the basis of untested calculations, and, absurdly, by the level of inflation in New York.

    • The ICSC did not decide to review its calculations despite the many concerns raised by the management’s statisticians about possible errors and ICSC’s findings that have been shown to lack robustness.  The review conducted by the ICSC did not address the root cause of the problem, the methodology nor the ICSC’s way of applying it, which undermines the technical credibility of a body that sets staff pay.

    • The “no pay cut” campaign, which has included townhalls, rallies, demonstrations, a work stoppage and a petition with almost ten thousand signatories, has shown the strength and unity of staff in Geneva and around the world, benefiting staff in other duty stations facing similar challenges. Management has also played an important role in negotiations with the ICSC and consistently argued that they have a duty of care to staff and a managerial responsibility to implement decisions based on evidence. Staff and management in Geneva have thus maintained a common position and a united front, which we hope will continue.

     

    We are continuing the analysis of the ICSC’s proposal, including the legal aspect, and preparing our response. We must also look at the larger issue of how we can put in place a more robust system for setting pay that gives greater weight to staff concerns.

     

     

    Media coverage:

     

    L’ONU rogne le salaire de ses employés à Genève | Bilan

     

    Genève : les fonctionnaires de l’ONU vont (un peu) se serrer la ceinture | Le Point International

    Tags:

    ICSC

    ICSC Summer Session

    7

    7 percent pay cut

    CCISUA

    Please reload

    Featured Posts

    The UN at 70!

    October 13, 2015

    The latest version of the Staff Union's TribUnion is out! !

    February 27, 2015

    Sign the Petition! Call for Pension Fund CEO and UN Secretary-General to Recognize the Votes of Staf...

    May 30, 2017

    1/9
    Please reload

    Recent Posts

    New CTSU President

    January 15, 2020

    Farewell...

    January 9, 2020

    New Committee elected

    June 20, 2019

    Out of office: Examining the relationship between stress and remote work

    October 1, 2018

    Recruiters in The Hague

    May 14, 2018

    Conspiracy of silence

    April 18, 2018

    MICT Staff Union addresses budget crisis with the Secretary-General

    January 30, 2018

    Pension Fund presentation available

    December 6, 2017

    Pictures of the final ICTY Staff Party

    December 5, 2017

    ICTY/MICT Staff Union participates in CCISUA mid-term meeting and lobbying in New York

    November 29, 2017

    Please reload

    Archive

    January 2020 (2)

    June 2019 (1)

    October 2018 (1)

    May 2018 (1)

    April 2018 (1)

    January 2018 (1)

    December 2017 (2)

    November 2017 (1)

    October 2017 (1)

    September 2017 (1)

    June 2017 (2)

    May 2017 (2)

    January 2017 (3)

    October 2016 (1)

    September 2016 (2)

    June 2016 (4)

    May 2016 (1)

    April 2016 (4)

    March 2016 (3)

    February 2016 (4)

    January 2016 (4)

    December 2015 (3)

    November 2015 (5)

    October 2015 (4)

    September 2015 (4)

    July 2015 (2)

    June 2015 (1)

    April 2015 (1)

    March 2015 (5)

    February 2015 (2)

    December 2014 (1)

    November 2014 (3)

    September 2014 (2)

    July 2014 (4)

    June 2014 (3)

    April 2014 (1)

    March 2014 (4)

    February 2014 (1)

    January 2014 (3)

    Please reload

    Home  >  News